Cryonics, Life Extension
Cryonics is the practice
of preserving organisms, or at least their brains, at cryogenic
temperatures where metabolism and decay almost completely stop,
for possible future revival. A person held in such a state (either
frozen or vitrified) is said to be in cryonic
suspension. Barring social disruptions of their suspension arrangements,
a suspended person is expected to remain physically viable for
a period of about 10,000 years, after which time cosmic ray
damage is thought to be irreparable.
Probably the most famous cryonically frozen
patient is Ted Williams. The popular urban legend that Walt
Disney was cryonically frozen is false (he was cremated, and
interred at Forest Lawn Memorial Park Cemetery). Likewise Robert
Heinlein, often said to be cryonically frozen, was cremated
and his ashes distibuted over the Pacific ocean.
Cryonics has been largely dismissed by the
mainstream cryobiology community, of which it is arguably a
part. The reason generally given for this dismissal is that
the freezing process creates ice crystals, which do irreparable
damage to the cells and cellular structures, making any future
repair simply impossible. Cryonicists, on the other hand, claim
that cryobiologists routinely exaggerate the extent of this
damage. The debate (which has been loud, hostile and sometimes
ugly) may have taken a turn in 2000, when a major cryonics organization
claimed to have virtually eliminated ice crystal formation,
and hence the major source of freezing damage, using a technique
called vitrification.
First, let us examine the situation pre-2000,
before the announcement concerning vitrification.
As a side effect of the traditional cryonic cooling process,
cell damage (irreversible by current technology) is caused by
ice crystals forming in the regions between cells. Critics often
maintain that, in addition, the intra-cellular water (inside
the cells) freezes to the extent that the cells actually burst
from the inside out. Cryonicists, however, claim this is simply
an oft-repeated myth with no basis in fact. Various "anti-freeze"
chemicals, typically glycerol, are pumped into the organs before
the process starts, in order to minimize the inter-cellular
ice formation. Critics maintain that because the organs are
already dead, these chemicals do not even reach the majority
of the cells. Cryonicists, however, claim that the situation
is not nearly that bad, so long as the cryopreservation process
begins immediately after legal death is declared, before much
damage has a chance to occur. Critics have always admitted that
an ideal cooling procedure, producing the "perfect freeze" with
no ice crystals (vitrification), is at least
possible in principle. However, achieving it has proven nontrivial,
with many problems, such as the inevitable temperature differences
between portions of the tissues in a large organ, and movement
of fluids upsetting the process, making it impossible to properly
control. Critics of the cryonics field have often quipped that
it is easier to revive a corpse than a cryonically frozen body!
But many cryonicists would actually agree with this (presuming
the corpse were fresh), but would add that while revival given
freezing damage may be a long shot, it is clearly the only shot
a just-deceased patient has, and thus is a still a rational
gamble to take. Cryonicists would also point out, however, that
the definitions of "death" and "corpse" currently in use may
change with future medical advances, just as they have changed
in the past, and so they generally reject the idea that they
are trying to "raise the dead".
The nature of the debate may have changed
drastically in 2000, with the announcement by Alcor Life Extension
Foundation that they can now vitrify a human
brain with virtually no ice crystal formation, using new state-of-the-art
cryoprotectants (adapted from conventional cryobiology research),
along with a new cooling procedure. While Alcor still admits
serious damage is inflicted on brain tissue in other respects,
the elimination of ice crystals would make future revival a
much more plausible proposition. Critics seem to be taking a
wait-and-see approach to this announcement, however, as Alcor
has yet to publish their results in the scientific literature.
Cryonics essentially started in 1962 with
the publication of The Prospect of Immortality by Robert
Ettinger, widely considered the father of cryonics. In the 1970s,
the damage caused during cooling was not well known. Two companies
went bankrupt and allowed their "patients" to thaw out, bringing
the matter to the public eye, at which point the problem with
the cellular damage became more well known. During the 1980s
the goal changed to brain preservation, on the assumption that
bodies could be regrown, perhaps by cloning of the person's
DNA. The main goal now seems to be to preserve the information
contained in the brain, on which memory and personal identity
depends, on the assumption that damage to anything else is in
principle repairable. Today, cryonicists point to nanotechnology,
claiming that perhaps in the future tiny microscopic computerized
probes swarming through the body will be able to repair cellular
damage at the molecular level... a kind of futuristic deus ex
machina that, while incredible and currently very much a matter
of speculation, may perhaps not be that much of a problem, given
the rapidity of scientific advances over the past century. It
is within this perspective that the habit developed of placing
more importance on the information content of the brain than
on its organic viability, Alcor (the largest cryonics organization)
especially adheres to this viewpoint, which is reflected in
most Alcor patients only opting for vitrification
of the brain over the alternative of glycerol-based freezing
of the whole body. Others question this emphasis on the brain,
however, arguing that there is no particular reason to suggest
that the mechanical structure of the brain is wholly responsible
for personal identity and memories. Partly for this reason,
the Cryonics Institute (the second-largest cryonics organization)
preserves only whole bodies.